AI for Evidence Utilization · Retrieve
PubMed and beyond: biomedical literature search in the age of artificial intelligence
Qiao Jin, Robert Leaman, Zhiyong Lu
eBioMedicine 2024
These slides were generated with the help of AI and may contain errors.
01Motivation
Biomedical search in the age of AI
- Biomedical knowledge doubles every few years.
- AI has transformed search — from ranking to embeddings to LLM assistants.
- The tool landscape has outgrown what most clinicians and researchers can track.
- Clinicians raise a question for roughly every other patient and leave about half unanswered (Del Fiol et al., 2014).
02Overview
The review surveys more than 30 tools across five information needs

03Scenario 1
Evidence-based medicine
- PICO-structured clinical questions.
- Queries are expanded and ranked to surface the best available evidence for a bedside decision.

04Scenario 2
Precision medicine & genomics
- Gene- and variant-centric retrieval.
- A genomic query is mapped to its many synonyms first, so variant nomenclature doesn’t fragment results.

05Scenario 3
Semantic search
- Queries and sentences are embedded by meaning.
- Equivalent phrasings (“heart attack” / “myocardial infarction”) retrieve each other.

06Scenario 4
Literature recommendation
- Topic- and article-based recommenders.
- Learn from a set of seed papers to surface related and follow-up work.

07Scenario 5
Literature mining
- Extract entities and their relations across many papers.
- Assemble a searchable knowledge graph.

08Summary
PubMed and Beyond at a glance
| Background | Clinicians now have far more than PubMed for finding biomedical evidence. |
| Problem | The AI-era search-tool landscape has outgrown what any clinician can track. |
| Approach | A practical field guide surveying 30+ tools. |
| Scope | Five information needs — EBM, precision medicine, semantic search, recommendation & mining. |
| Conclusion | A practitioner’s map to the right AI-era search tool for each need. |